Where did the White Man come from?

[Bob137]

36:3.8 When the Life Carriers operating on a new world have once succeeded in producing a being with will, with the power of moral decision and spiritual choice, then and there their work terminates—they are through; they may manipulate the evolving life no further. From this point forward the evolution of living things must proceed in accordance with the endowment of the inherent nature and tendencies which have already been imparted to, and established in, the planetary life formulas and patterns. The Life Carriers are not permitted to experiment or to interfere with will; they are not allowed to dominate or arbitrarily influence moral creatures.

This part specialties as humans not having a spirit, or soul, just a compilation of materials which in time develop a thinking process, I personally believe in the Body, mind, consciousness, as I have all these, and they did not come about from evolutionary type speculations from some higher being,t hat watched me grow to what mankind has become now. I was in the beginning a spirit consciousness, came in to this body vehicle by my own choice, and have reincarnated numerous times for my own development, and will return to the Super consciousness, (GOD Consciousness), when I am ready, willing, and able. Other than that, how the bodies were developed for the process of a spirit coming into them, are numerous theoretical speculations, in which evolutionary possibilities, Ancient Alien, and other spirit/body type entities creating us, or other dimensional beings, Angels, or that in our spirit consciousness when all were within the cosmic consciousness, we created these body vehicles for our spirits to inhabit, for explorations of infinite existences.

[druid1]

Many say white people came from Iraq, or other areas of the cradles of civilization. This does not make sense to me. The peoples that are there today have not achieved any high levels of advancement. The asians last invention was gunpowder, and they played with it. Why have not the other peoples advanced along the same path as white people through their own knowledge and genious? We have all these fantastic monuments but the peoples who live anywhere close haven't built anything and live like nomads, or hunter-gatherers. Doesn't make sense to me. Many say whites lived like barbarians in european forests. OK, so in 2 thousand years then whites have come out of the stone age to go to the moon, while others who had the advantage of the combined knowledge of the greeks, romans, sumarians, indus valley, mayans, etc. have done nothing? Where are the cars, radios, tvs, etc., from these other places. Also, you can tell where the advancements are by looking at the language naming the discovery. If there is no word for it in that language then they didn't invent it. Almost all modern inventions have english names. Just because the patents were taken to Japan, or elsewhere to be mass produced does not mean they invented it. Do we call 'computer' by a japanese name? No. I think we are all living off the genious of a handful of white men. Edison, einstein, newton. Maybe the alien DNA exhibits itself once in awhile through these geniouses and savants. Maybe the whites came from a more recent alien intervention and that explains our catapulting above the others in terms of technological advancement. And it is advancement because you don't see anybody going back to life without cars, tv, AC, and everything else. Thanks for reading!

[Moon]

While the Europeans were going through the Dark Ages and moving backwards, the Arabic peoples were going through a Renaissance of their own. They were inventing algebra and modern mathematics, using many tools and bringing a very rich culture in arts and sciences.

When we look at the region now, we tend to see the opposite: European cultures are making great advances while the Arabic peoples seem to be stepping backwards through their own Dark Ages.

The main problem with the technological advances now is that it is all materialistic in nature. There is a dearth on the artistic and spiritual natures here.

There is much evidence now showing that the Egyptians were mainly African peoples when the great empires started. So we have to be careful to claim one group of people have always been advancing, when we can see it goes through cycles.

There is a lot of evidence pointing to the cradle of civilization of being the start of the Caucasian race. Even those who go to the region now will notice many blond haired blue eyed peoples in that region.

[coomba98]

With regards to different cultures advancing and stopping and advancing and maybe go backwards abit and then advancing or further backwards and etc.etc.etc.

Think of the Arabic Nations throughout history. Ye everyone gets into wars and the like, but the Arabs, Damn! its non-stop for the past however many thousands of years. Wheather their attacking or defending! This could be the one main reason for the Arabs not moving forward as fast as the other cultures. Remember its almost 'always' on their home soil.

Its abit sad because most of our early knowledge in science comes from them, now its stunted because of afew evil individuals trying to dictate their own views. If only we could all be in peace! How far and how much could we accomplish!

But back to the white man...lol ye give me some attention. lol.

I made an earlier comment that their where no white man in Sumeria or Persia and the like as represented in Hollywood. I was advised I was incorrect in this assumption but cannot remember or find the response.

Does anyone know of any scientific knowledge of the earliest known white man? Man not God.

[Bob137]

Some believe Adam was white, but I believe he was Arabian, due to the most likely Eden is supposedly Iraq, but also Eden was supposed to be to the East, and may have been to the East of Iraq, not in Iran, or even further east. The definition of where it was located, could fit more in Iraq though.

[coomba98]

New theory of where the white man came from. Neanderthal's!! Theory though.

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=2281

http://eztv.it/

BBC Planet of the Apemen, Battle for Earth 1of2 Homo Erectus
BBC.Planet of the Apemen Battle for Earth 2of2 Neanderthal

[phoenix]

This post is perhaps slightly on the side of what the topic in this thread is about, but it hit me the other day that something is missing in The Bible, all Pseudepigrapha, all Apocrypha , all the Sumerian texts and many, many other texts. They do not tell the complete world history that I once believed. Instead they only tell the history from the Middle East and Europe and a few african counties.

The history of the races from the Asian continent are completely missing, so are the races from ancient south and north America, as well as most of the African continent and the oceanic countries. What could this mean?. Why is it that these continents and races are almost completely left out in all these texts?

I have recently studied the migration that happened after the great flood and the dividing of “the earth” between the 72 races that survived the flood. The more and more I study these stories , the more I get confused. The 72 races and the continent they are dividing amongst themselves only seem to deal with the different Semitic , Arabic and European races and the division of Europe and the Middle East. All other races and continents are completely left out. Not a word is mentioned about them as far as I can see.

Could it be that other colonization projects such as those we can read about in the Bible , were going on simultaneously on other continents? It is (for example) rather strange that the Chinese people who are more than a billion people today does not provide us with stories from this time at all. With such a great amount of Asian people , one should think that the creation must have started a lot earlier on this continent than in Europe and the Middle East. Also, the multitude of huge ancient structures on this continent surely seems to indicate a large level of ancient alien activity.

Regards
Phoenix

[Polaris]

This post is perhaps slightly on the side of what the topic in this thread is about, but it hit me the other day that something is missing in The Bible, all Pseudepigrapha, all Apocrypha , all the Sumerian texts and many, many other texts. They do not tell the complete world history that I once believed. Instead they only tell the history from the Middle East and Europe and a few african counties.

The history of the races from the Asian continent are completely missing, so are the races from ancient south and north America, as well as most of the African continent and the oceanic countries. What could this mean?. Why is it that these continents and races are almost completely left out in all these texts?

I have recently studied the migration that happened after the great flood and the dividing of “the earth” between the 72 races that survived the flood. The more and more I study these stories , the more I get confused. The 72 races and the continent they are dividing amongst themselves only seem to deal with the different Semitic , Arabic and European races and the division of Europe and the Middle East. All other races and continents are completely left out. Not a word is mentioned about them as far as I can see.

Could it be that other colonization projects such as those we can read about in the Bible , were going on simultaneously on other continents? It is (for example) rather strange that the Chinese people who are more than a billion people today does not provide us with stories from this time at all. With such a great amount of Asian people , one should think that the creation must have started a lot earlier on this continent than in Europe and the Middle East. Also, the multitude of huge ancient structures on this continent surely seems to indicate a large level of ancient alien activity.

Regards
Phoenix

We share similar thoughts, questions and misgivings...the absence of sumerian writings about the other 4 major civilizations on this earth...
This leads me to think that the Eurocentric view of the world is myopic at best. And mainstream science has been co-opted by that same myopic view and they have done everything possible to contain it...and surreptitiously supported by some members on this discussion board...

[Bob137]

I also believe that mankind's history as it is, is flawed. As stated nothing in regards to the Asiatic of China, which goes back as far if not farther than the Eurasian societies, as does from India, and from more findings of South America, and more than likely also North America. We just haven't got the real picture yet, and whenever evidence comes to light other than what mainstream wish to except, it is usually discredited prior to investigation.