Mandalor wrote:I have a feeling that we have a really tiny picture of our history. Much smaller than most people might think it is. I think the more they find cities and settlements underwater at depths that put them on places on our time line that don't fit our current model, the more it leaves what we do up reinterpretation. When a city is found submerged that puts civilized living back at least 20k+ or more, that is a huge gap and an even huger piece of the puzzle missing. Eden could be anywhere as well as still underwater.
And as far as our destructive side being a head of the game, I'd have to agree with that because more often than not, even what we perceive as creativity and advancement have bi-products and unintentional destructive end results. Every step forward in tech has a huge environments pricetag attatched that most don't ever see. And thats all besides the intentional destruction and abuse of the environment that goes on in the world. As Americans we don't see the uglier realities that go on everywhere else. Humanity is Moonwalking. Looks like we are taking steps forward only to be sliding backward.
About the part that I highlighted: I agree. We only know about a very small portion of our history. And the more we find out, the further back it seems to put us. Even though there is very little if any hard evidence to back it up, I think that human civilization is at least 30,000-50,000 years old, if not older.
Who knows if there were not civilizations that even pre-date this?
As to Göbekli Tepe, I would like for the research team to look further for some type of settlement. After all, unless you subscribe to the notion that Aliens put the blocks in place, which I am reluctant to accept without hard evidence, it takes a lot of organization to move stones of such weight. Organization implies people and people have to be fed, housed, etc.