Moderators: siren13, Essence, Giorgio Tsoukalos
maxmercury wrote:Email received from Lloyd Pye to ease some of the confusion on what has been found:
Basically they have the proof of the DNA, but they need to recreate the whole genome to satisfy the mainstreamers.
Hearte wrote:maxmercury wrote:Email received from Lloyd Pye to ease some of the confusion on what has been found:
Basically they have the proof of the DNA, but they need to recreate the whole genome to satisfy the mainstreamers.
That's one way of looking at it.
Another would be that he will never actually prove anything because it's not true and if he really pursues this and is found to be wrong, the money stops rolling in.
Harte
Hearte wrote:That's one way of looking at it.
Another would be that he will never actually prove anything because it's not true and if he really pursues this and is found to be wrong, the money stops rolling in.
Harte
maxmercury wrote:Hearte wrote:That's one way of looking at it.
Another would be that he will never actually prove anything because it's not true and if he really pursues this and is found to be wrong, the money stops rolling in.
Harte
Hearte, I have communicated with Mr Pye a number of times on this and other subjects. He is very down to earth and if this thing turned out to not be hybrid that would of been the end of it.
maxmercury wrote:But the latest DNA test results do show the Starchild Skull is something that is completely new here.
Hearte wrote:
The thing already turned out not to be a hybrid in earlier tests.
Harte
Hearte wrote:
I'd be interested to "click here and see why."
Harte
maxmercury wrote:There is a newer video on the preliminary results of the Starchild Skull DNA tests. They are very interesting, but more testing needs to be done, plus the usual peer reviews.
http://www.starchildproject.com/
I have been following this for a while, and hope it does turn out to be the smoking gun that it promises to be. This is one of the few tangible finds that has not fallen to the wayside or has been hidden in some academia circles. I did not know where to post this, and this seems appropriate.
maxmercury wrote: Also, since there are no human/alien hybrid specimens out there that have been acknowledged, how would the computer know to pick that one as an option?
Hearte wrote:maxmercury wrote: Also, since there are no human/alien hybrid specimens out there that have been acknowledged, how would the computer know to pick that one as an option?
Good question.
So, how could we find out?
By "clicking here to see why."
Hearte
greekben wrote:Would be nice to have a link to the podcast posted later if possible.
greekben wrote:Found it FREE on youtube, no need to "subscribe" to listen!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G9TscxoXEjA


mahalla2 wrote:Will the new DNA information be able to tell us how the skulls were elongated - naturally or by cradleboarding at infancy?

Metaluna wrote:It sure looks to me like that can not be the result of cradleboarding or anything like that, there is too much skull..know what I mean ? if all of that was round instead of enlongated, those would be mighty big round skulls.
Or as the Coneheads called us..Blunt Skulls.
Bob137 wrote:Have they done anymore tests on the Starchild skull lately for complete analysis?
Bob137 wrote:Thanks, I have read his information on it, I jsut hadn't seen any updates, so as you ahve stated, I guess he is still awaiting on either government funding, (very doubtful), or some wealthy person. A wealthy greedy person would want some way to make money off of it, for him to put money into it.
Bob137 wrote:That's for sure. since the latest testing shows it isn't a regular human at least, and nothing before or since has come up with an explanation of the sequencing, other than alien dna!
Return to Forbidden Archaeology / Alternative History
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests