Moderators: siren13, Essence, Giorgio Tsoukalos
Sunrisepony wrote:I agree, there are way to many out there that are giving the genuine ones a bad name. And, as for test I think they're a good form of indication but I wouldn't even say they're 100% reliable either. Until science (at least on a mainstream level?) is able to catch up with the Psi abilities, and mainstream science and other important fields are ready to admit the existence. I think one of my favorite past times is pointing out the "charlatans" or "cold readers" they just rub me the wrong way, ugh. I've even pointed out a few fake Animal Communicators along the way.
As for TV are you referring to James Randy or was it hmm John Edwards? There's a cold reader with some talent if I ever saw one. And James Randy was just recently arrested I believe for countless fraud charges.
I think charlatans/fraudulant/fakes aside. One of the biggest issues I've found and I think it's wholly unfair and unreasonable expectation. Is that they demand those with genuine abilities to be 100% accurate, and if they even miss ONE tiny detail or maybe only range around 75% - 95% accuracy they are automatically called fakes. With little to zero understanding of how it really works, 100% accuracy is as I've said before impossible for any earth human to achieve with what is in essence foreign language translation of information that comes in various forms. And, I say that goes for Channelers, readers, Animal Communicators. The whole nine yards of the Psi spectrum.
Every human being here on earth is born with the ability to be psychic, or what I think is more appropriate 'term' of just higher sensitivity range of the senses. It is the environmental conditions in which they are raised that determines wither they develop those higher ranges of the senses or shut them down. There are certain things I think that Influence how strong they are and what part of the spectrum the 'strongest' abilities fall into, but mostly it's environmental influence as to wither they develop in the first place or not.

Sunrisepony wrote:I agree, there are way to many out there that are giving the genuine ones a bad name. And, as for test I think they're a good form of indication but I wouldn't even say they're 100% reliable either. Until science (at least on a mainstream level?) is able to catch up with the Psi abilities, and mainstream science and other important fields are ready to admit the existence. I think one of my favorite past times is pointing out the "charlatans" or "cold readers" they just rub me the wrong way, ugh. I've even pointed out a few fake Animal Communicators along the way.
As for TV are you referring to James Randy or was it hmm John Edwards? There's a cold reader with some talent if I ever saw one. And James Randy was just recently arrested I believe for countless fraud charges.
Randi's Pederasty
Like many tricksters, some of Randi's antics have caused problems for himself. He was forced to resign from the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal (CSICOP) because his accusations provoked lawsuits against hte Committee. One of the most publicized involved physicist Eldon Byrd, a friend of Uri Geller. On May 10, 1988 Randi made a presentation for the New York Area Skeptics in Manhattan. After his lecture, during the question and answer period, a member of the audience confronted him with a tape recording, which allegedly had Randi speaking in explicit sexual terms with young men (the recording was not played during the public meeting). I was present and watched as pandemonium almost broke out. Randi did not completely regain his composure. He accused Byrd of distributing the tape and went on to claim that Byrd was a child molester and that he was in prison. He made the same assertion in an interview with Twilight Zone Magazine. This was untrue, and in a jury trial he was found guilty of defaming Byrd.
Randi has never been married, but his sex life has received published comment regarding rumors of pederasty, including from a longtime friend James Moseley. Randi threatened lawsuits over them, but he never carried through.
http://canibuscentral.ihiphop.com/forum/lofiversion/index.php/t44539.html
February 11, 1996, Toronto Star: "What I had hesitated to mention is that the colorful Randi has been involved in a number of lawsuits. Part of the evidence brought against Randi was a tape of his telephone conversations, of explicit sexual content, with teenage boys. Randi has at different times claimed that the tape was a hoax made by his enemies to blackmail him, that he made the tape himself, and that the police asked him to make it. Whichever version is true, it's amazing indeed that such a person could be taken seriously as a scientific adviser in an organization dedicated to denying claims of child sexual abuse."
http://www.isgp.eu/dutroux/FMSF_freaks.htm
maxmercury wrote:Sunrise, it is up to the individual as to whether or not to charge any fees. I just question some of the motives of people who do make a living off of psychic abilities. Again, that is me and does not reflect other peoples.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests