What topic would you like to see an AA episode of?

[Liborio]

I would also like to see an episode where they discuss those matters, and I would also like to see some more DNA testing results on humans around the world, and the Star Child Skull,a nd the elongated skulls, etc....

Definitely in relation to these topics they have already touched on, they could really go in-depth, I think there is a lot more to them to be discussed. Very, very interesting.

[allspark]

I think it's amazing that after 3 series, they have still only scratched the surface of the mysteries that are out there. I'm sure that a lot of people who have watched this type of programme for the first time are beginning to awaken to the fact that there is/has been something very extraordinary going on.
I agree with a lot of you when you ask for more depth of analysis within each of these enigmas.
It would be nice to see some opposing views ( especially if they interview people like Zahi Hawass ) so that we can have a good laugh at some of their theories.
Also, i don't remember seeing anything about the moon on any of the shows. Or did i miss that one ?

[Liborio]

I think it's amazing that after 3 series, they have still only scratched the surface of the mysteries that are out there. I'm sure that a lot of people who have watched this type of programme for the first time are beginning to awaken to the fact that there is/has been something very extraordinary going on.
I agree with a lot of you when you ask for more depth of analysis within each of these enigmas.
It would be nice to see some opposing views ( especially if they interview people like Zahi Hawass ) so that we can have a good laugh at some of their theories.
Also, i don't remember seeing anything about the moon on any of the shows. Or did i miss that one ?

They've touched on the moon maybe being hollow, astronauts claiming it rang like a bell on a landing and also touching on the fact that the moon could've been or is being used as a hiding place to secretly check on us. There's been a few astronuats who have come forward saying they were being watched no doubt about it, but were told to stay quiet. One in particular is Gordon Cooper. I think they could also talk in-depth with former astronauts what they know. We could be surprised.

[cRush]

I still can't believe we haven't seen any episodes on Mars, or the Moon.

Mars is loaded with evidence suggesting that at one point in time, it could've support intelligent life.

The Moon is purported to be a possible alien base, though I don't subscribe to that theory myself.

These topics could be split in to two separate episodes.

[Bob137]

Also to include the report on one of Mar's moons that is possibly not a moon, or an asteroid, but was made by ancient astronauts! I think it is called phobos.

[allspark]

This ones for cRush ( i am aware that this is not a moon thread, however.....
This photograph was taken on Dec 17th 2005. It is Aristarchus crater on the moon where ocasionaly.........it lights up !



close up....



here is where you can see that picture again and you can enlarge. It's the best photograph of the moon you are ever likely to see.
http://www.thelivingmoon.com/43ancients/02files/Moon_Images_Mike.html

here's ' the living moon' main website, a must see for anyone interested
http://www.thelivingmoon.com/43ancients/02files/Moon_Images_Menu.html#2
cRush, i hope you can find time to explore that site, it may change your mind

[Bob137]

There are a lot of images on that site, that show some strange anomalies for the moon. I would speculate, that they do have a base or bases on the moon, but are keeping it secret.

[cRush]

Those pictures are interesting for sure, but with such low resolution of the areas in question, it is very hard to tell what those areas are. It could just be light reflecting off a crater as we see all over the moon surface in the same picture. The light reflecting is similarly colored.

Nonetheless, I'll check out the site linked, and see what I think about what they have to say.

[mahalla2]

It would be interesting to know why photo's taken of our astronauts on the moon seem to always have a blacked out background so I have to ask the question, what does our government (NASA) not want us to see?

Here are a couple photo's from the National Geographic website:

[Moon]

Cydonia of Mars, the Face of Mars, the monolith of the Mars moon Phobos, Luna (Terra's Moon) all need to get some episodes devoted to them. There are many researchers out there who are examining the enigmas that have not been answered yet.

[Bob137]

I agree whole heartedly, we do need an epeisode devoted on these subjects.

[Liborio]

It would be interesting to know why photo's taken of our astronauts on the moon seem to always have a blacked out background so I have to ask the question, what does our government (NASA) not want us to see?

Here are a couple photo's from the National Geographic website:

Always wondered that myself. I just thought it was the camera not able to pick out the stars, but it never made sense because just like in the dessert far away from city lights the stars shine the brightest at night, and I would think they would be the same or even brighter out in space or at least on the moons background.

[cRush]

:shock:

It would be interesting to know why photo's taken of our astronauts on the moon seem to always have a blacked out background so I have to ask the question, what does our government (NASA) not want us to see?

Here are a couple photo's from the National Geographic website:

Always wondered that myself. I just thought it was the camera not able to pick out the stars, but it never made sense because just like in the dessert far away from city lights the stars shine the brightest at night, and I would think they would be the same or even brighter out in space or at least on the moons background.

They are brighter out in space, until you are standing on the Moon's surface, which is reflecting sunlight. I'm sure you've looked at the Moon in the night sky and noticed how brightly it glows. That's from light reflecting off of it's surface. Now when you are standing on the Moon's surface, and you try to look at the starry sky, it's like standing in a florescent lit room and trying to do the same. The stars are simply getting contrasted out in the background as the light in the foreground is overpowering and the camera has to compensate. The light levels have to be dropped so that the foreground isn't washed out from so much light, which effectively eliminates the lower light levels in the background.

[mahalla2]

sorry cRush but I just don't buy that explanation -

[Liborio]

I can't believe that standing on the moon the surrounding skies (back ground) can be pitch black. Because even in the early morning just before sunrise when it's already clear some stars are still visible in the sky.

[Bob137]

I still have problems with the flag flying int he wind? That is just not possible on the moon!

[Moon]

I can't believe that standing on the moon the surrounding skies (back ground) can be pitch black. Because even in the early morning just before sunrise when it's already clear some stars are still visible in the sky.

I notice several stars and planets during dusk and dawn. The Earth also has an atmosphere which makes it difficult to see stars during these time periods while the Moon does not.

I am not saying the pictures of the Moon Landing are fake and it is possible the Sun shining on the Moon might be able to drown out the stars.

[Liborio]

I whole heartedly believe we landed on the moon. I'm just agreeing with what Mahalla2 suggested about all or most moon shot backgrounds seeming blacked out and what did the government or NASA have to hide. Because I'm sure they could have faked a back drop of stars if that was the fact. I think maybe something else was the reason because that back ground looks too black.

[Bob137]

Even with a glare from the Sun, in that kinda darkness one would have seen at least one star.

[Inquiring Mind]

The secret, black-op space programs have likely been in operation for aeons, far beyond what is known in the public sector. I believe they went to the moon, just not with standard rocket technology! Jay Weidner's amazing documentary "Kubricks odyssey" is a must see:

Kubrick's Odyssey
Secrets Hidden in the films of Stanley Kubrick
Part One: Kubrick and Apollo


A Film by Jay Weidner

Produced by Cubed Brick Productions

This provocative and insightful film is the first in a series of documentaries that will reveal the secret knowledge embedded in the work of the greatest filmmaker of all time: Stanley Kubrick. This famed movie director who made films such as 2001: A Space Odyssey, A Clockwork Orange, The Shining and Eyes Wide Shut, placed symbols and hidden anecdotes into his films that tell a far different story than the films appeared to be saying.


In Kubrick's Odyssey, Part I, Kubrick and Apollo, author and filmmaker, Jay Weidner presents compelling evidence of how Stanley Kubrick directed the Apollo moon landings. He reveals that the film, 2001: A Space Odyssey was not only a retelling of Arthur C. Clarke and Stanley Kubrick's novel, but also a research and development project that assisted Kubrick in the creation of the Apollo moon footage. In light of this revelation, Weidner also explores Kubrick's film, The Shining and shows that this film is, in actuality, the story of Kubrick's personal travails as he secretly worked on the Apollo footage for NASA.

Read the Review from The Red Dirt Reporter.

"Weidner produces devastating proof that the landing was shot in a studio on Earth."
--David Icke

"Everyone at Discovery Space loves a good space conspiracy theory ... Weidner grasps onto various bits of imagery in the film and deviations from Stephen King's novel as Kubrick revealing his secrets to the unsuspecting audience ... The whole theory is strangely fascinating”
--Discovery News

"a thought-provoking experience..."
--(Seattle) Examiner.com

http://store.sacredmysteriesmarketplace.com/dvds/kubrick-s-odyssey-part-1-dvd.html?CFID=18095884&CFTOKEN=1d12d577e30ac1b4-3A044A17-1422-1DE9-ED198E8BCCD6259D&jsessionid=f2309b0b40b316742528

“We already have the means to travel among the stars, but these technologies are locked up in black projects, and it would take an act of God to ever get them out to benefit humanity. Anything you can imagine, we already know how to do.”

--Ben Rich, Lockheed Skunk works director, father of the stealth bomber, 1995

http://www.ufo-blogger.com/2010/08/ufo-are-real-ben-rich-lockheed-skunk.html

[Bob137]

I also believe they have secret space programs, but I just have not seen actual proof as of yet, other than odd flying ufo's that are more than likely ours, and not aliens. Although I am sure there are a lot of alien ships that come here, I also believe that our government is utilizing some also.

[mahalla2]

I still have problems with the flag flying int he wind? That is just not possible on the moon!

yes, I agree Bob - There is possibly a vacuum effect that while placing the pole in the ground might have caused some movement for a few seconds but there is absolutely no one around the flag in this photo and the flag is still waving.

[Bob137]

The flag waving either means that:
1.) They had a fan with them on the moon, (for what reason I would not know).
2.) There is an atmosphere of some sort on the moon, (which they say is not possible).
3.) They faked those shots. (because they did not go to the moon at that time).
4.) The exhaust from another ship landing. (That they forgot to mention).
5.) They went to the moon, but could not put in a flag. (So they edited it in later in a studio).
6.) The moon rang like a bell when they inserted the flag. (The vibrations moved the flag).
7.) The flag was self propelled for movement. (It was a robotic flag)
8.) The flag did not move. It is an optical illusion. (Everyone on earth watching it was on LSD).
9.) The flag moved due to circumstances beyond their control. (in other words they were in a studio).
10.) The flag is not a flag. (The flag is an extension of America, so know one can question it, or Big Brother will get you).

[Moon]

Here is a YouTube video of Mythbusters debunking the waving flag on the Moon:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMBCfuKs9i8

[Bob137]

I never trusted those guys, I seen some of their stuff that was not right and was wrong before. I would have to try that myself to believe it.

[Moon]

I never trusted those guys, I seen some of their stuff that was not right and was wrong before. I would have to try that myself to believe it.

I know what you mean as the one guy states there is no atmosphere on the Moon when there is actually trace atmosphere. While it is tiny when compared to Earth, a scientist should know these things if they are trying to disprove another idea.

[Sunrisepony]

My friend Fu said he visited a friend at JPL here in Southern California, and that they had sets in one of the larger rooms and they were what was used to "go to the moon." Not sure exactly how reliable that he is, I haven't been to JPL my self to see them. But, I have to wonder with the great distance, and the amount of Jet Fuel it would take to get there, if it was even possible back then? But, then there is speculation we've had anti-gravity technology since 1938.

[Liborio]

Even with a glare from the Sun, in that kinda darkness one would have seen at least one star.

You would think, huh

[Liborio]

The flag waving either means that:
1.) They had a fan with them on the moon, (for what reason I would not know).
2.) There is an atmosphere of some sort on the moon, (which they say is not possible).
3.) They faked those shots. (because they did not go to the moon at that time).
4.) The exhaust from another ship landing. (That they forgot to mention).
5.) They went to the moon, but could not put in a flag. (So they edited it in later in a studio).
6.) The moon rang like a bell when they inserted the flag. (The vibrations moved the flag).
7.) The flag was self propelled for movement. (It was a robotic flag)
8.) The flag did not move. It is an optical illusion. (Everyone on earth watching it was on LSD).
9.) The flag moved due to circumstances beyond their control. (in other words they were in a studio).
10.) The flag is not a flag. (The flag is an extension of America, so know one can question it, or Big Brother will get you).

These would make David Letterman's top 10 reasons why the flag waved on the moon. And make David himself laugh out loud. Great job Bob. I'm still laughing as I write this.

combined posts per forum rules-MM

My friend Fu said he visited a friend at JPL here in Southern California, and that they had sets in one of the larger rooms and they were what was used to "go to the moon." Not sure exactly how reliable that he is, I haven't been to JPL my self to see them. But, I have to wonder with the great distance, and the amount of Jet Fuel it would take to get there, if it was even possible back then? But, then there is speculation we've had anti-gravity technology since 1938.

It's very true that our government does not inform us on everything they do. Some of it has to do with "National Security" but the other who know's why. On the rocket fuel thing though, it is my understanding that you need only so much push from the rockets to scoot the vehicle along at amazing speeds in outer space. Thus really needing most of the fuel for leaving our atmosphere and re-entering it. Anyone can correct me if I'm wrong on this.

[Bob137]

I believe that they do use most of all the energy to leave earth's atmosphere, the rest of the fuel expending is relatively small compared to what is used to get off earth. That is why we need a moon based system of building space vehicles, and a space docking station big enough for numerous vehicles to dock,a nd people to board and unboard for flights from earth, to the moon, from the moon, and to the earth, and maybe some asteroids and other moons , and planets.

[cRush]

For those of you who are still unconvinced that the backdrop for the Moon photos should have been all black, I have an experiment for you all to try:

Tonight, go outside in your back yard, turn your outside lights on and put a flash light at your feet facing up. Now look at the sky and tell me how many stars you see. Remember that this is still less light than what is reflecting off of the moon's surface.

Undoubtedly, I will get some dishonest answers with claims of seeing tons of stars. I have done this test myself and couldn't see a single star.

[mahalla2]

well, if anyone wants another laugh here is the official photo of Buzz Aldrin's footprint on the moon:



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buzz_Aldrin

[romanxxl]

I would like to see in next Ancient Aliens about:
-Monolith on Phobos and other anomalies on Moon and Mars
-famous labyrinth in Memphis in Egypt which is buried somewhere under desert.

Thank you

[Sunrisepony]

Here's one.

The Lost City of Aramu Muru and the associated Star Gate.

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sumer_anunnaki/reptiles/reptiles22.htm

[Bob137]

Sunrisepony, that is a very interesting article. I had not heard of them in a long time, and it is about time someone started rediscovering these, and the connections. I know there was one researcher who connected the peoples of India, and Egypt and Sumeria, and Orientals, and that others have come across other artifacts connecting them to the Americas, and to ocean voyages, but this puts it on a higher level,a nd if those sites become archeological discoveries, then it should change our history for sure. Thanks for the connection, and I agree this does need to be put on the AAT series. You might want to try to contact Giorgio on this, on Facebook, it seems he is on there a lot also.