Huge fan Giorgio. I think it is amazing what you guys are doing here with the Ancient Astronaut Theory. Too long has it been shrouded in darkness and Ancient Aliens is one of the main reasons people are waking up and looking at history in a new light.
Although that I agree with most of your theories, there is one thing that I was hoping you could help me understand better, in order to get a better grasp of the overall picture that you see regarding the AA theory. I was just watching the Joe Rogan podcast recently, which was very interesting by the way, and you had said something that I never heard you say before and it struck me.
You said that the "aliens" looked just like humans, and there were never any bird-people, insect-people, etc... The reason this confuses me is because by watching the passed 2 seasons of Ancient Aliens, I was under the impression that you believed the complete opposite.
Clearly there are paintings, and depictions of humanoid looking beings with inhuman like features, you even described a few of them in the show. Describing antanae, wings, oddly shaped heads etc. So basically, my question is what do you truly believe the ET's from our passed looked like? You have described reasons that both human looking and animal-like aliens may have existed, but after watching the Joe Rogan podcast I got the impression that you felt strongly that the aliens looked like us and not like an "alien" per say. I don't mean to accuse you of being hypocritical, but can you please help clear this up for me?
Do you think it was only 1 race visiting all of these cultures? Or was it many races, thus resulting in different descriptions and depictions? I understand that they were depicting what they saw in the best way they could, or it could all be just symbolism. But then again, that could be what they really saw.
I am not sure if you will understand what I am getting at but hopefully you can clear this up for me. Thank you.