Legendary Times Magazine Global Community Network

[nathanallan]

I floor every person I have asked (even that archaeologist teacher of mine) with that question: Why is there no soot in the pyramids? It's my personal belief that there were electric appliances used in ancient Egypt.

I posed a question to all my teachers, what would happen to, say, a laptop of today, if it got buried, after 6k years? AFAIK silicon won't survive and turns to dust, the copper and metals get scattered in miniscule portions and plastics also don't survive. People in 6000 years would find the tiny copper and metal pieces (sound familiar?) and wonder what the heck they were, and how primitive man made such microscopic metal parts (if our civilization doesn't survive, that is).

Nathan

[messiah]

I’m Petros Petrosyan from Armenia. I was born in 1962. In 1985 I graduated from Yerevan Engineering University.
Since 1988 I have been seriously interested in the problems connected with the origin and predestination of the pyramids.
The following things were ascertained by me:

1. The pyramid is not only the mausoleum for the pharaoh, and the main motives, which were the source of its construction, were not in this platitude. Here it must be emphasized, that Egyptology has never accepted even the thought of any serious discussion on the problem concerning the code of the pyramid, being in constant contradictions with pyramidology mainly in this cause.

Thus Egyptology deprived itself of the chance of taking part in finding ways for the true resolution of this problem.

2. All architectural-construction parametres of the pyramid are of no principal significence from the point of their cryptographical value. Trying to solve the problem of the hypothetically supposed code of the pyramid, many pyramidologists often turned to different pseudo-mathematical interpretations, which were nearly always connected with the geometrical parametres of the Great Pyramid of Giza.

Following this way, every time pyramidology considerably stands aside from the true way of solving the given problem.

3. The essence of the code is hidden in those peculiarities of the geometrical form of the pyramid, which stipulate the definition of the given geometrical form.

4. I fixed the principal model of the cryptographical matrix the code of the pyramid. The principal model of the hypothetically supposed code of the pyramid consists

of 365 small pyramids, which from the facets of the 14-stepped big pyramid.
5. It was settled, that the Bible has the very direct relationship with the suggested code. In addition, some parts in the Bible at the same time are the constituent parts of the code and keys for its deciphering.

6. The figures 365 and 14 are considered to be one of the main keys in deciphering it.

7. The coded information about concrete extents, which is difficult for me to express, refers to the principal aspects in the formation of the Solar system, the planet Earth, bases of the Matter organization, factors creating time and many other things as well. 8. In the process of investigations on the principal model of the code, I finally undertood, that the information, which interests us-is coded in the way of various geometrical compositions, which are fixed in the structure of the code itself. Geometrical compositions of small pyramids can be both flat and volume-spatial.

9. Whit the help of the academical methods of mathematical analysis of definite geometrical compositions of small pyramids are received concrete figure systems and mathematical equations and their essence and significence are always defined with the help of the periodical list of the chemical elements.

To visit PETROS PETROSYAN'S web site go to:



http://freenet.am/~messiah
http://www.gizapyramid.com

[MANKIEWICZ]

Hi Petros!

I like your evaluation of the Great Pyramid. However have you read the
rather lengthy Piazzi Smyth 1880 edition of The Great Pyramid?
Piazzi Smyth was Astronomer-Royal of Scotland and member of the Royal Society of Edinburgh.

It was really the first scientific expedition to complete John Taylor's work
in the 1860's.

First impressions mean a lot. I was awed by Taylor's first impression
of the Great Pyramid. I quote: "For, besides coming forth -suddenly- in the primeval history of its own times without any preliminary period of
childhood, or known ages of evolution and preparation, the actual facts
at the Great Pyramid , in the shape of builded proofs of an exact numerical knowledge of the grander cosmical phenomena of both earth and heavens, not only rise above and far above, the extremely limited
and almost infatine knowledge of science humanly attained to by any
of the Gentile nations of 4000, 3000, 2000, nay, 1000 years ago; ...
he goes on to say ".....essentially above the best knowledge of
man in our own time as well." End Quote, 'The Great Pyramid' page
13. This is quite a statement!

Also of note is Taylor's observation of pi as expressed as the vertical height of the Great Pyramid as the radius of a theoretical circle,
whose circumfrance is equal to the sum of the lengths of the four
sides of the Great Pyramid. He compensated for the casing stones
absence.

I retired as a mechanical engineer for a large printer company and
had my own lab there for many years performing many non-contact
measurements for stress and strain as well as motion analysis with
LDA and LDV systems. It is rather unsettling to witness "current"
writings establishing the base of the Great Pyramid to be level
within a half inch using laser systems!

I have read many attempts to verify all this with prehistoric knowledge
but it doesn't wash. And, many sad attempts to move the stones
with boisterous claims; forgetting we are in this century now and
think and reason accordingly.

This is an exciting topic! I hope more join in!
I admit I am an armchair enthusiast now who reads a lot but hopes to go
there soon to see it first hand!

Best Regards Sir
_________________
Mankiewicz

[Cartomancer]

Is it possible that all of the artwork and carvings were added as the pyramid was built? In this way the interior could have been finished in daylight and then encapsulated in the subsequent construction.

[timeTraveler]

[Cartomancer]

O.k. no artwork or carvings. The point I was trying to make is that the reason there is no soot is that the corridors and chambers were finished in the light of day while the pyramid was being built. The fact that there is no artwork or carvings makes what I am saying easyer to do. They may have simply finished the inside as it was built in the light of day.

At what point since the pyramids construction are we certain no one cleaned it? Accounts of the first opening say that there were salt deposits all over the interior. Did someone clean this off? It is no longer there.

[MANKIEWICZ]

Hello all!

No soot. This compliments a recent "educated" opinion on the History
channel against the light bulb theory saying "if there were
light bulbs - where are the bulbs and where are the wires??

Hellooo! Copper wires ( IF COPPER WAS USED) would have:

A) Disintegrated by now.

B) Been removed after their use. (Logical -as no "tours" would have
been given by the designers for the casual use of the lights!)

As for the bulbs; being made from glass (I assume) could also
have been removed and been possibly broken or stored somewhere
else (like under the Syphinx.)


[Remember; the Great Pyramid was broken into long before
the Smythe expedition and anything like light bulbs or wire remnants
could have been pilfered.]

As for the no soot comment; -I'm in favor for the electric light
theory. Again it's only a theory so far.
_________________
Mankiewicz