Sure you think I jest?
Not at all, quite on the contrary,
in fact, the United States Constitution explicitly states that "No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States."
McCain's U.S. citizenship called into question: Candidate, born in Panama Canal Zone, may not qualify as 'natural born'.
John McCain was born August 29, 1936, in the Panama Canal Zone, to two U.S. citizens. It is a common misunderstanding
that the zone was a U.S. territory - in fact, the U.S. had lease rights, but not territorial rights.
McCain’s happenstance of his birth in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936 are reviving a musty debate that has surfaced periodically since the founders first set quill to parchment and declared that only a “natural-born citizen” can hold the nation’s highest office.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/28/us/po ... ccain.html
Just google 'is john mccain a us citizen'
and you'll find TONS more evidence suggesting that McCain is NOT even a natural born U.S. citizen.
Yet the public sleeps - once again.